Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeón Casero, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorCano Suñén, Enrique
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T21:23:29Z
dc.date.available2021-06-16T21:23:29Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn978-958-764-868-3 (versión digital)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11912/8709
dc.description22 páginasspa
dc.description.abstractUrban violence is normally analyzed from socio-symbolic positions in which the political significance of the city (polis) prevails over its character as a constructed material artifact. From this ethical-legal horizon of interpretation, the difference established by Walter Benjamin between violence that is founding, conservative or destructive of law has been left at a dead end –unable to conceptualize a purely extra-legal violence understood as something other than the expression of subjective and personal anger conceived as an explosive manifestation of meaningless energy that would serve no purpose nor be a means to any end.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pontificia Bolivarianaspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEspacio público – Violenciaspa
dc.subjectViolencia urbanaspa
dc.subjectDemocraciaspa
dc.titleTecnologías de la violencia urbana: la insuficiencia de las críticas a la violencia de Walter Benjamin, Peter Sloterdijk y Slavoj Žižekspa
dc.title.alternativeUrban violence technologies: the insufficiency of the critiques of violence in Walter Benjamin, Peter Sloterdijk and Slavoj Žižekspa
dc.typebookPartspa
dc.description.sectionalMedellínspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International